Data analysis: good but ...

Authors

  • John C. Gower Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The Open University, UK
  • Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Stellenbosch University, RSA
  • Niël J. Le Roux Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Stellenbosch University, RSA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26398/IJAS.0029-016

Keywords:

Visualisation, Data, Algorithms, Data-structure

Abstract

In the 1950s Tukey and Benzécri led the Data Analysis movement, opposed to the perceived mathematisation of statistics. This has flourished but we perceive some troubling
problems (Greenacre prefers challenges or opportunities) which are addressed in the paper. These problems are manifest in the simplest analyses of two-way arrays of data
(Sections 2 - 3) and become worse with higher order arrays (Section 4). The most important thing about Data Analysis is the Data, its type (e.g. how data is collected, the physical kinds of variable, categories, counts, etc.) and the data structure (e.g. arrays, multiway tables, symmetry etc.). Analysis is concerned with models, distances, norms, measures of
approximation and algorithms. Perhaps Data Analysis is in some danger of replicating the kind of mathematisation it was designed to supplant.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-18

How to Cite

Gower, J. C. ., Gardner-Lubbe, S. ., & Le Roux, N. J. . (2020). Data analysis: good but . Statistica Applicata - Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 29(2-3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.26398/IJAS.0029-016

Issue

Section

Latest articles